And moreover, as far as I know, many students including me encouraged you to cheer up. But as far as I know, school did nothing to u it was the students. No offense though cuz i know that it had nothing to do with school's stance. Also, by the article representing a KMLA student's thoughts, you may assume that it's the overall thoughts spread in KMLA or it's what the student is told. and you see that the article is 'published' You may get a sense, while reading the article, that it's not the school's stance. You see an article with the name KMLA posted up. well, let's put this to a simple thought. That point, I, possibly some other people, thought that u were complaining about how the fundamental structure is working - sorry if it wasn't thoughĥ. It may not have been ur intention, but to me, it sounded as if u were not satisfied with what people are saying about 전교조 (one of the unions), which extremely many people do, and it sounded as if u were not satisfied with the current structure of people bifurcating within two unions.
I think I caused some kind of misunderstanding for ur point about condemning fundamental structure of Korean Teachers' unions. THBT people can use anonymous IDs in newspaper websitesĤ. THBT students have right to use school's privilege (without school's permission)ģ.
However, even if I were a highschool student in America, I would not have joined Moore's movement since it is not truly aiming for genuine democracy, and because the validity of information posted in the website is questionable.ġ. Anonymity often incapacitates people's conscience, and thus, produces great amount of forged information.Īs a student attending KMLA, I am very much complacent about the status quo where freedom of speech is guaranteed. Words undoubtedly exercise huge power on people. Founding of restaurants in America experienced sharp decline when one of the web users revealed a false statistic that 90 percent of new-born restaurants go bankrupt in their first years. It can be used to humiliate certain people and disseminate false information. Its meaning reaches further than just its explicit denotation that your name and identity wouldnot be revealed. The credibility of information used in his webpage rouses suspicion. When the topic fails to embrace all kinds of ideas-both for and against the school policies, it is not an authentic democracy that Moore's movement aims for. How would students stand in a stance in support of government or school when the topic is 'Live from Madison: What's happening now?' and Moore himself is covering his webpage with writings that lauds student protests?- Madison is the place where recent student protests occurred. The topics he posts up on his website ( ) are clearly urging for criticism. Though he claims to advocate unrestrained share of diverse opinions from students, he puts too much emphasis on 'reforms'- all his articles commend student 'uprisings'. Moore and his "Highschool Newspaper" is biased. Michael Moore's arguments have critical fallacies. Putting aside all the gratifications of freedom I feel, I cannot join Moore's movements. For instance, current EOP helper system was contrived and settled by students of EOP department Chicken Day was originally settled by proposals made by students.
Mbox office mojo michael moore free#
Students in KMLA are free to speak or write their own thoughts about school they are even encouraged to make suggestions under the idea of student autonomy. Having retained confidence in our assured liberty in KMLA, I could not feel empathy for the problem Michael Moore pointed out it was a distant issue for me (I assume that you know Michael Moore and his arguments^^).
Mbox office mojo michael moore full#
What was interesting was that the school did not make it an issue that its name came up in the article- when even the students gave full vent to their defiant feelings! At the moment, I was excited by the 'freedom of speech' we students have in school we are free to share our opinions even if that is a radical political claim! It was rather radical, for the article condemned the fundamental structure of Korean education which had the possibility of conveying the false idea that KMLA itself was supporting these radical views. Last year, one of the freshmen in KMLA posted an article expressing his opinion about conflicts between two prevailing Korean school teachers' union( )
0 kommentar(er)
